Isn’t our professional life pretty miserable?
The nation’s system of primary care is horribly broken…primary care is maddeningly stuck in a bygone era. [i]
…primary care medicine is such a soul-wrenching, demeaning endeavor [ii]
…there is another major crisis: the continued deterioration of primary care that threatens to break up the very foundation of U.S. health care…less than one in five U.S. medical graduates are now entering a primary care specialty[iii]
It certainly is easy to find alarming statements about primary care across the media. That is neither new nor surprising. The fact that medical students have been walking away from primary care has been known for the past 10 years.
What has astounded me in the past year is how resistant many primary care physicians are to change. If primary care physicians were happy with their professional life, had enough family time, or got paid at the top levels, then maybe “no change” would make sense. But the exact opposite of all the above is true.
The frustration over the present working situation is seen in the entire country – I have personally met three PCP’s who were suicidal due to work issues and needed professional help because of this reality. I spoke at a AAFP national meeting and all the 150 physicians in attendance rated the presentation very high, but zero were willing to try the change.
No question that the practice of primary care is miserable, but what makes change so difficult? Some possible reasons:
- No credible change to try
- Don’t have time or energy to investigate a new idea
- Changes for the staff would overwhelm them – their job is frustrating enough as it is
- Don’t have the finances to consider any changes
- Administration will not allow us to make any changes
- The government and payers have too many controls in place to allow any changes
- It will make me too vulnerable – at least I am familiar with this present situation
Change is always a risk: sometimes right, sometimes wrong, but always a risk. The familiar seems safe, even though it may be outdated or destructive. We all hesitate to change. Even the best can get it wrong.
“This ‘telephone’ has too many shortcomings to be seriously considered as a means of communication. This device is inherently of no value to us.”
– Western Union memo, 1876
Who knew communications in 1876 better than Western Union? Was their refusal to change because the phone was a bad idea or was it just an internal resistance to change? They got it wrong, and left the door open for ATT .
“But what…is it good for?”
– Engineer at the Advanced Computing Systems Division of IBM, commenting on the microchip, 1968
Who was better at computing systems than IBM in 1968? What has changed our lives more than the chip in the last 30 years?
This internal resistance to change is in all of us, but this resistance can be very harmful. The status quo seems like “home” because we are familiar with it. Because we all love being “home”, we are very vulnerable to missing good changes. If the home is in the path of a coming interstate, one better accept change.
With the advent of modern medicine in the 1920’s, the delivery of health care had to change. The house call had been the standard of health care delivery for 200 – 300 years. But now with the development of new treatments ( insulin, penicillin ), the discovery of new technology ( the x ray and blood work), and our growing population, the tried and true house call was too inefficient and cumbersome. The traditional office became the standard.
Has managed care, our aging population, and significant pharmaceutical advances now made the tried and true traditional visit of primary care inefficient and cumbersome? To be wrong on this could have devastating consequences.